Dollar reset: how inflation is being quietly recalibrated
Felix Nikolas Prehn explains how a change in inflation measurement could mask rising prices while the Treasury floods the system with liquidity.
Felix Nikolas Prehn, economist and former investment banker
Listen on YouTube
The dollar reset now under way is not a dramatic redenomination but a slow widening gap between official inflation figures and actual living costs. Felix Nikolas Prehn traces the chain from mortgage rates approaching 8 per cent to the bond market repricing risk at levels last seen before the 2008 crisis. He outlines Bill Ackman's argument that rate rises may be feeding rather than fighting inflation, because AI capital spending and embedded financing costs pass straight through to consumer prices. The episode then examines how the government is changing the PCE calculation method, which one Wall Street strategist estimates could shave half a percentage point off reported inflation without any price in a shop falling. Prehn shows how the Treasury's TGA account is injecting tens of billions into the banking system independently of the Fed, effectively making the Treasury the real central bank. He concludes that the combination of reported lower inflation and quietly looser liquidity amounts to a slow transfer from savers to the government.
In this episode
- Mortgage rates jump toward 8 per cent overnight
- Bill Ackman argues rate rises may feed inflation
- AI spending ignores higher borrowing costs
- The Fed faces two losing doors on rates
- Government changing how PCE inflation is measured
- Prices up 2200 per cent since 1940
- The quiet dollar reset plan explained
- Treasury TGA account becomes the real central bank
Transcript
Mortgage rates in America just jumped to 7.45%. A day before they were 7.2%, so it's a huge jump in just one night. People who trade this stuff for a living I've spoken to say 8% is coming next. That's happening at the same time that the people in charge tell you they've got inflation under control, which is odd if you think about it for a second. Because if they are under control, why are they working on a way to make the inflation numbers smaller without a single price in the shop coming down?
So I'll show you exactly how they're doing that because I was just reading about it and I'm literally sitting here on the tarmac. Someone's going to say Felix is in a fake plane. No, it's actually a real one. It's funny, isn't it? Someone said the other day about my hotel room as well. But this is public information. It's just people don't know where to look. People don't look for it. And people don't seem to be joining the dots, and by people I mean mainstream media.
So I apologise, the sound is going to be a bit crappy, might be a bit wobbly and all of that, but I think it's that important that I'm willing to do this off the cuff here for you and put together 3 things that really, really matter. I think if you put them together, you'll see why they're so important for your portfolio and your decisions coming up. So one of the best known billionaire investors in America has just said publicly that the medicine might now be feeding the disease. What do I mean by that? Well, if he's right, every move that the Fed's making from here to fix this inflation problem is actually making it worse.
So your mortgage, your pension, the cash sitting in a bank account, your portfolio, every one of them gets measured against a number and that number is being rejigged to be something different. So the question is, do they know something you don't? And I would wager that they do and I want to make sure that you know what they know so you're just as well informed to make better decisions.
If you're wondering who I am, I'm Felix Nikolas Prehn. I'm an economist, I'm a former investment banker. I'm also the founder of the Prehn Institute where we publish research on financial markets and provide instructions and so on. Zero sponsorships on this, zero endorsements ever, and that way I can say whatever the heck I want as we're literally just taking off there, which is quite lovely and rather dramatic, probably a little noisy. I'm sorry about that.
But I will also spend the rest of this flight sitting down and actually writing this out for you to make sure all the numbers and so on really land for you. And you can download that at felixfriends.org/dollarreset. So that's where we're going to put it, link will be down below in the description. So read it alongside or read it afterwards.
The fact that you're actually watching this and you're putting up with this bumpiness and the terrible light and the crappy audio means you're actually kind of special. Because we talk about mortgage maths and bonds and stuff that puts most people to sleep, but most people will find out about what's happening here in a year or 2 from a headline that will say, oh, the great scandal of 2026, but they learn about it in 2028, and by that point it's too late. So well done for finding out about this right now.
So let's just start with the simple stuff, your mortgage. Most people assume that the Fed sets mortgage rates, but it doesn't. A 30-year fixed mortgage in America follows the government bond rates. So it's the amount of money America pays to borrow for 10 years. When investors demand more to lend to the government, the banks will demand more from you buying a house. And that 10-year interest rate has just gone to the highest level since 2007. I don't need to remind you that a little thing happened in 2008 called the global financial crisis.
So the increase in the mortgage costs for people who are buying homes now comes from the bond market. So it's all the investors in the world, the smart ones, and they decide what you pay for your mortgage. And then on top of that, the Fed came out and they raised the interest rate. We seem to be expecting one more interest rate. That's what 16 out of 18 Fed officials pencilled in. So think about who actually is going to feel that. Anybody who's looking to buy a home. In fact, anybody looking to sell a home because you have to find a buyer. You're going to find a buyer with a 4% mortgage rate or got cash. So borrowing gets dearer and that typically means people spend less and prices calm down.
The billionaire hedge fund manager I was alluding to, a chap called Bill Ackman, he's a pretty big deal, just ask him. He's just put out a note and he said, what happens if the economic textbook is wrong this time? His argument goes like this. Raising rates is supposed to work by cutting demand. People and businesses borrow less so they buy less so prices come off. But what if the biggest buyers in the economy right now don't care about money costs? You see, the race to build super intelligent AI has, in his words, a near infinite return on investment. Actually he said ROI, bankers.
So if you think the prize is that big, you're not going to stop buying chips and power stations and building data centres because the loan went up by a quarter of a percentage point. You just keep buying. So the demand the Fed is trying to cool, well it doesn't cool. It doesn't care what it costs. And the numbers actually back up Bill Ackman. Companies are expected to sell somewhere around about $500 billion of new debt this year just to pay for AI. This is just AI build, and that's borrowing on a scale that just doesn't care. The rates go up.
And then he says, look, interest is embedded in everything. Think about the lorry that moved your food to the supermarket. It was bought on finance. The warehouse it came from was built with a loan. The supermarket carries its stock on credit. The builder putting up new homes in your town is paying interest on every brick until the house sells. So when the Fed makes money dearer, all of those costs go up and they get passed on to you and you pay more.
So you get a loop. The Fed raises the rates to fight prices. Business costs go up so prices go up. So the Fed raises again because inflation's gone up. So Ackman's basically saying, I think, this is a quote, "I think the Fed might have just made a mistake. Am I right or am I wrong?" And I actually think he's right. He's a very smart man, and I actually think on this one it makes a lot of sense.
You see, in the past when we raised interest rates, it does cool stuff down. It cools down the economy. But that only works if you have a demand problem, like too much money chasing too few goods like after the pandemic. This one here looks very different. This is about shortages. Shortages of homes, shortages of power, shortages of chips. You don't fix a shortage by making it more expensive to build the thing that's short. Shortages of diesel, shortages of fertiliser, all those things. You're not going to stop eating. Trucks are not going to stop rolling.
So picture the Fed standing in a corridor here, and there are 2 doors in that corridor. Door one is keep raising rates. And if Ackman is right, you feed the loop you're trying to break because more inflation. And then there's door 2, where you stop raising the rates and inflation runs hotter than you wanted to. So either way, the person sitting in cash or in bonds or saving or being just a bit scared about the market and therefore not investing is on the wrong side of what's happening. Even the Fed admits inflation isn't going to come back down to 2% till 2029, which is never ever. Consumers expect inflation to be 4.6%.
So what do most smart people do? Well, most smart people have been told just buy an index fund. Tuck it away, don't look at it, just buy it. And that worked really, really beautifully when rates were low and falling year after year. It's a lot more problematic when rates and prices are climbing together. So that's honestly the problem.
What do you actually do about it? Let me give you something practical. Investing used to be like you plant an oak tree, you pick up something solid, you plant it in your account, you walk away, you come back 20 years later and you got a beautiful oak tree giving you shade. And for our parents' generation, that actually worked pretty well because rates were coming down for decades.
But that strategy that built your parents' retirement, I just don't think it'll build yours because the system's changed. Money is moving faster than ever. The traders are moving faster than ever. I don't know a single guy on Wall Street or on a hedge fund who's a buy and hold guy or a value guy. They just died out. They're going with the flow or the arc.
So what do the skilled money guys do? Because that's what they are. They're not smarter than you. Don't call them smart money. It's skilled. Well, they follow the money. They watch where the big institutions are moving their cash and then they move with it. They don't fall in love with a stock or a position for life. And my hope is that we can teach you that strategy because I've been using that for years and I know.
Plenty of people who've been using it for decades. And if you're willing and open-minded, write "open" in the comments down below and I will then teach you this live and for free for about 2 hours this coming Saturday. I call it "Why buy and hold is dead and what Wall Street does instead." And we're going to do that together live. Not quite sure where I'll be on Saturday, but I'll make sure I'm awake so it'll work for you time zone wise if you're in the US or in the UK or in Europe, pretty much everywhere, Asia.
And if you're thinking, "Oh, it sounds complicated," well, relax. It can be done with index funds. It's actually very simple and I'll walk you through it and you can ask me questions live, which is a bit better than this format here on the plane. So get yourself a free seat, buying.net. There's a link down below in the description to sign up for it. And if you ask for a replay, no sorry, we don't do them, they don't work. So write "open" in the comments and let me know you're coming.
But let me come back to the number that the government's rewriting, and it's literally stranger than anything I've read in a long time. The Fed, you see, has a favourite inflation measure, and you don't really read about it in the news because it's really boring. It's called PCE, and there is a core version of it where they remove food and fuel because apparently we don't need it. It's the number that the Fed actually steers by, which is just weird, isn't it? The inflation measure they steer by excludes food and fuel. Try living without food and fuel for a week, see what happens.
But that's the number they look at when they raise or cut interest rates, and they're changing how they are calculating it. I know it sounds pretty specific and all that, but there's a chap on Wall Street called Tom Lee and he's a very well-known strategist. He's kind of a permabull and he thinks it could knock off half a percentage point of inflation just from the method change. So no price in America has to fall. No shop has to sell something cheaper. Your weekly shop costs can still go through the roof, your car insurance and all that. But the number just comes out just a little bit lower basically.
And good old Tom says it's extremely bullish for stocks. And I think weirdly he might be right in the short term because the number's going to go lower. People won't understand why and they're going to go bananas with it. But think about what it means. The Fed raises rates because inflation is too high. Now they are massaging the number that they watch to tell whether it's, it's like taking a thermometer and it says you got a 38 degree fever Celsius, or whatever, some Fahrenheit, apologies. And you think, well, I could take the fever down and do something about it, or I could just scratch out the 38 on the thermometer and make it 36 or whatever, right, 37.
So that's kind of mad, isn't it? That's kind of crazy. That's literally what the government is doing. So we're fighting inflation by adjusting how we calculate it. Weird, eh? And it's kind of funny, it's kind of sad at the same time. Governments have done this for a long time. And they'll justify it. They say, "Oh, spending habits have changed or new products came in the basket or whatever."
And no matter what the government number is, have a look at this number here. From 1800 to 1940, prices in America rose about 0.2% a year. 0.2% a year for 140 years. Over 140 years that is 28% in total. So your great great grandparents or something, they could basically put their money in a drawer and they'd basically buy them roughly the same thing a few decades later. But since 1940, inflation has averaged 3.7% a year, which is 2,200% inflation since 1940. So something that cost a dollar in 1940 costs $22 now.
So when you look at these numbers, 0.2% before the war, 3.7% since the war, sounds like a tiny number, right? But the difference is huge. It's 28% versus 2,200%. And it's a quiet transfer from savers to borrowers. And the biggest borrower on earth is who? You guessed it right, it's the US government.
So let me just teach you the plan here. And it's kind of the one I called unthinkable in the silly title here, but people don't announce it like this. But here is what it actually is. First, a government with a debt this size cannot afford high interest rates for long. The interest bill will just get bigger and bigger. Second, you have the Fed that just raised rates and it may do it again, which makes the interest worse. And then third, the measure, the indicator the Fed uses to decide whether rates should go up or down is being, well, recalibrated would be the polite way for putting it. And maybe you can think of a better way, put it in the comments.
So you put those together and you get your path out, right? So you let prices run a little higher, you report them a little lower, you just fudge it a bit and you use the lower reading to lower your rates. And that way your interest rate costs go down. And that way the debt shrinks a little bit every year. But at the same time, the dollar also buys a little bit less every year. And that's all it is. That is the reset.
It won't be a great big bang or a new currency or a stablecoin or something on a Monday morning. No, it's just a gap between the official number and your actual bills. So the official number says, "Oh, things are coming down," but your actual costs are doing the opposite. Now, most people trust government numbers. So the retiree whose pension is inflation linked or something, they think they're doing the right thing. People sitting in cash, they think they're being careful, they think they're doing the right thing because they're trusting the numbers.
So what do we watch out for here? We don't watch the Fed. You watch the Treasury's bank account. The Treasury has a bank account called TGA, and it's the government's current account, and it's at the Fed where they just print the money. And last week, the Treasury used that money to inject $57 billion into the financial system in just a week. And that money flows into the banks. And there's no talk about it. I couldn't even find a press release on it. The Fed isn't involved in it.
And the week before, well, the week before it was about a trillion dollars and bank reserves fell. There's a small bank in the US just collapsed, by the way. So when the government doesn't pump money into the banking system, the money tends to flow into the government's coffers and therefore money leaves the liquidity. And what that's really telling you is that the Treasury, Bessent, is becoming the central bank.
And it gets even weirder, and I appreciate this is a little technical, but at the New York Fed conference, officials discussed the idea of Treasury lending its spare cash into the overnight lending market. Now in plain English that means the government would take its own cash pile and push it into the plumbing that banks use to fund themselves. And it means that the Fed doesn't have to do it.
So why would you want to do this? The Fed's just raised rates and told the world, "We're going to be tough on inflation." And so they can't as well turn around and say, "Well, we're going to print money." They are doing it, of course, but they're not telling you about it because it looks ridiculous. But you see, the government, the Treasury can, and they can do it through this account that nobody have heard of, but now you have, the TGA account. So the Fed looks tough on inflation, but the Treasury, the government, keeps the system afloat. And the headline will just say rates are going up, inflation's going down, right? So they say the tough thing, they do the soft thing somewhere less visible. They tell you inflation is being fought, well, while inflation is actually going up.
So what do we do about it? Well, there's hard assets. There's gold, right? Tends to do well, but it's not right now. When wars get worse, gold tends to underperform. When oil prices go up, gold tends to underperform. When interest rates go up, gold tends to underperform, at least for a period. But the people I know benefiting from this, the ones running the funds, the hedge funds and so on, they're not even buying gold. They can see it. Just look at the gold charts. If you know what to look for, you can see the institutions aren't really buying it.
So they are just floating around, they're making money, they're trading, but they're moving away from the inflation risk, they're moving away from the AI risk. And if you're game, if you're open to it, I'll teach you that structure, that system this coming weekend on Saturday at the free seminar we're going to run, "Why buy and hold is dead in 2026 and what Wall Street does instead." And there is no catch. There's nothing you got to do. You just got to sign up, you got to show up, take some notes. And I will actually teach you and I enjoy that tremendously because I think everybody deserves to understand this. I think everybody deserves to know the rules that money actually is run by and I think everybody deserves to understand how relatively simple it is. So grab yourself a free seat, buying.net, links down below, and graduate from buy and hold to hopefully buy and grow, which is really what the goal is here.
What's happening, or is sitting in cash, or is waiting for the dip or whatever, just send them that link or send them this video and hopefully we can help them before this structure, this system does what it's meant to do, which is move your money into the government's money. It's a tax. It just isn't announced. It isn't on your tax bill, and it's going to hurt, unfortunately, a lot of people.
I hope, and I know that was a little unstructured, I hope it was still somewhat useful. We're now properly in the air, although it is rather cloudy, so not much to see. And I will enjoy a little snack, maybe have a nap, and I wish you all the best. Take care.
Right now, I think we're going through some weird phase transition. And normally when you get bad economic news or you get bad jobs data, people are going to fly to safety into the bond