Essay · 28 October 2026

The Bretton Woods System Is Being Restructured by the Officials Who Built It

Felix Prehn examines the deliberate restructuring of the Bretton Woods system, from dollar devaluation to central bank gold buying and investor risk.

By Felix Nikolas Prehn · 5 minute read

Felix Nikolas Prehn, economist and former investment banker
Felix Nikolas PrehnEconomist and former investment banker

The Treasury Secretary's Declaration

Scott Bessent has stated that America is in the middle of a Bretton Woods realignment.

Bessent called for a reset of banking regulation and the global monetary system. His call covers trade, lending rules and currency policy. It extends to the institutional architecture in place since 1944.

The declaration matters because it frames what follows not as market accident but as deliberate policy. The post-war system is being taken apart. The government that sat at its centre is doing the dismantling.

How Bretton Woods Built American Dominance

In 1944, 44 countries gathered in a small town in New Hampshire. The war had destroyed Europe.

The deal made the US dollar the world's reserve currency. Gold backed it at 35 dollars an ounce.

Bretton Woods gave the world a stable and trusted monetary system. It fuelled the greatest economic expansion in modern history, building highways, suburbs and the American middle class.

Under Bretton Woods, America could not print more dollars than it had gold to back them.

The Vietnam War and social programmes broke that constraint in the late 1960s. France sent a warship to demand its gold back from the United States.

Nixon responded in 1971 by taking America off the gold standard. He knew the government had printed more money than it had gold to cover.

After 1971, the dollar was backed by nothing physical. It rested on trust in the US government.

The gold standard had prevented excessive money printing. Without it, inflation became a permanent feature of the system rather than an aberration.

The Debt and Dollar Erosion

The federal government collects about 5 trillion dollars in taxes and spends close to 7. The Treasury borrows to cover the gap.

The Federal Reserve prints money to buy that debt. The new money enters the economy, meaning more dollars chase the same goods.

The result is inflation. The US national debt is heading towards 40 trillion dollars.

Asset owners benefit from this arrangement. More money chasing the same stock of gold bars or property pushes prices up.

Annual gold production adds little to the existing stock. Wages and savings, by contrast, lose purchasing power year after year.

The dollar's share of global reserves has dropped from 71 per cent to under 58 per cent. BRICS nations are reducing their dollar use. They are building new payment systems, including a SWIFT competitor called CIPS.

Headlines on de-dollarisation remain contradictory. Some reports describe concrete steps. Others call the effort more talk than action.

The Mar-a-Lago Accord and Dollar Devaluation

The premise for this policy is that the dollar is too expensive, making American products uncompetitive.

The administration's response appears to be a plan known as the Mar-a-Lago Accord. It is modelled on the 1985 Plaza Accord and would push the dollar down by 20 to 40 per cent.

Steven Myron, the chair of the Council of Economic Advisors, put out the 20 to 40 per cent figure. A decline of that magnitude would make American manufactured goods cheaper relative to foreign competitors. Factory jobs in Ohio become more viable if the dollar drops 30 per cent.

Imported goods become more expensive.

Financial commentators have discussed a possible second Plaza Accord. Some describe a Bessent doctrine in foreign exchange management.

The name "Mar-a-Lago Accord" has not appeared in confirmed policy documents.

Deregulation, Trade, and the 333 Plan

Bessent wants to unwind the financial crisis regulations that came in after 2008.

Looser rules allow banks to take on more risk. Bankers will take that risk because their careers are short.

They collect bonuses, and if the bank fails, it is bailed out. The incentive structure rewards risk-taking and socialises losses.

The administration's trade programme targets 3 per cent GDP growth, a 3 per cent deficit and 3 million barrels a day of extra energy. The United States is already the world's largest oil and gas exporter.

If the reset works as planned, domestic manufacturing and energy production would expand. Companies that make goods in America would benefit from a weaker dollar and tariff protection.

A 3 per cent deficit would require cutting the current 2 trillion dollar annual shortfall by more than half. Tariff revenue and growth may or may not close that gap.

Gold, Central Banks, and the Asset Shift

Gold has gone from 2,000 to 4,000 dollars in about 2 years. Central banks globally are buying gold at record pace and plan to buy more. China has imported record quantities, according to industry data.

Institutional investors, however, have been selling gold even as central banks accumulate it. Prices have fluctuated.

Central banks are buying gold with the same domestic currency they themselves create. The institutions that print money are converting part of their reserves into gold.

BRICS nations are reducing dollar holdings and building alternative payment infrastructure. The dollar's reserve share fell from 71 per cent to 57 per cent. The decline coincided with BRICS payment initiatives.

Gold pays no yield (no interest). It generates no cash flow. Its price reflects what buyers are willing to pay for an asset that cannot be printed.

Cash, Concentration and Timing

Companies such as Microsoft and Netflix get about 40 per cent of their revenue from foreign markets. A weaker dollar means those overseas earnings translate into fewer dollars when repatriated. Tariffs add a second layer of pressure on firms with supply chains that span borders.

The S&P 500 is heavily weighted towards large technology firms with exactly this kind of international exposure. A portfolio concentrated in the index carries more foreign currency risk. The label "US stocks" obscures that exposure.

Cash balances lose purchasing power through a separate channel. Inflation already exceeds the interest earned on most deposits. A dollar decline of 20 to 40 per cent would compound that loss.

Precise timing of the transition is unreliable. Rate cuts do not always coincide with rising stock prices.

In 2008, interest rates dropped by nearly 5 percentage points and the S&P 500 fell 38 per cent. The 2008 episode contradicts the assumption that monetary easing protects portfolios.

Dollar dominance, free capital flows and post-2008 bank rules formed one system. Bessent's agenda covers the dollar, bank rules and trade at the same time.

The Bretton Woods system that emerged in 1944 lasted 27 years before Nixon ended gold convertibility. The post-1971 dollar system has lasted more than 50 years. Bessent's declaration places the current administration on the side of restructuring rather than preservation.

From an episode of Felix & Friends on YouTube. Watch the talk

About the author

Felix Nikolas Prehn is an economist and former investment banker. He co-founded TradeVision.io and founded Winston Daily and The Prehn Institute. Winston is his adopted golden retriever. Felix is a vocal advocate for animal rescue.

About The Prehn Institute

The Prehn Institute is an independent research institution. It publishes research on the financial markets and provides instruction.